---
title: "IVS värderingsstandarder"
description: "IVS 300 för anläggning och maskiner, och IVS 103–105 när maskinen är pant."
canonical: "https://cendex.group/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder"
markdown: "https://cendex.group/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder.md"
type: "hub"
noindex: false
language: "sv"
---

# IVS värderingsstandarder

IVS 300 plant and equipment, IVS 103–105 reporting and machinery valuation standards for bank collateral.

## Vilka det är till för

Valuation methodology, credit risk and collateral teams implementing IVS-aligned machinery valuation at portfolio scale.

## Omfattning och varför det spelar roll

International Valuation Standards (IVS) provide the reference framework for defensible fair marknadsvärde on plant and machinery charged as bank collateral. IVS 300 addresses plant and equipment specifically; IVS 103–105 govern reporting, bases of value and valuation approaches that must be explicit in every kreditakt.

EU banks cannot treat machinery valuation as a black-box appraisal order. Supervisors and workout teams ask: What basis of value was used? What investigation level was proportionate? Were comparables from relevant secondary markets? Was condition reflected? Was the report IVS-aligned or merely indicative?

Heavy equipment amplifies methodology risk. Two nominally identical wheel loaders can differ 20–30% in value based on hours, undercarriage wear, regional demand and attachment packages. IVS requires transparency on assumptions, limitations and scope — qualities that generic AVM templates built for real estate rarely provide.

This section guides valuation methodology, credit risk and collateral teams implementing IVS-aligned machinery valuation at portfolio scale: IVS 300 scope, market versus likvidationsvärde, forced-sale scenarios, RICS VPGA 5 cross-reference, and documentation that survives audit.

## Ansvar mellan funktioner

Successful ivs valuation standards programmes assign clear accountability across credit origination (policy adherence), collateral operations (monitoring execution), valuation methodology (IVS standards), model risk and compliance (AI governance where applicable), and second-line review (sampling and challenge). Equipment finance portfolios fail audits when these functions operate in silos — policy exists but nobody owns monitoring evidence, override logs or investigation level decisions on high-EAD excavator, loader and tractor exposures.

### Making IVS operational at scale

IVS alignment is not achieved by adding a logo to a desktop estimate. Banks need methodology policy that specifies basis of value, investigation level, valuer competence requirements and report structure per facility type. Credit analysts must understand when IVS 103 reporting elements are present versus absent.

Portfolio programmes should include quality assurance sampling: second-line review of assignments for scope adequacy, comparable relevance and limitation disclosure. High-EAD assets with thin markets deserve higher investigation levels — policy should say so explicitly.

Link IVS refresh rules to CRR monitoring policy so valuation expiry, market events and LTV drift trigger proportionate re-investigation — not ad hoc requests when workout already looms.

## Supervisory perspective

Supervisors and internal audit sample maskinfinansiering files for proportionate collateral governance — whether monitoring history exists between appraisals, whether investigation level matches exposure, and whether AI-assisted tiers have override documentation. Weak ivs valuation standards practice appears as generic policy language without equipment-specific evidence on excavator, loader and tractor files.

## Regelverk och standarder

Institutions working on ivs valuation standards should map processes to applicable frameworks, including:

- [IVS 300 Plant and Equipment](https://www.ivsc.org/standards/international-valuation-standards)

- [IVS 103 Reporting](https://www.ivsc.org/standards/international-valuation-standards)

- [IVS 104 Bases of Value](https://www.ivsc.org/standards/international-valuation-standards)

- [IVS 105 Valuation Approaches](https://www.ivsc.org/standards/international-valuation-standards)

Cendex lämnar inte juridisk rådgivning. Map requirements to your CRD/CRR transposition, internal risk appetite and qualified adviser review. For depth, read the featured research paper below and the individual guides in this section.

## Nyckelbegrepp

Concept
What EU banks should document

IVS 300 scope
Plant and equipment assets within assignment boundary

Basis of value
Market value vs likvidationsvärde explicitly stated (IVS 104)

Valuation approach
Market, income or cost approach selection and rationale (IVS 105)

Investigation level
Inspection depth proportionate to value and risk

Reporting
IVS 103-compliant report structure in kreditakt

Limitations
Assumptions and scope constraints visible to credit committee

## Referensdata för portföljen

The tables and charts below summarise illustrative institutional benchmarks for ivs valuation standards on EU maskinfinansiering books. Use them to calibrate policy thresholds, RFP scorecards and monitoring design — not as market quotes or legal thresholds.

  Desktop proportionate share
  55–70%
  Homogeneous low-EAD

  Field inspection trigger
  >€500k EAD
  Typical bank policy

  Report element completeness
  78%
  IVS 103 checklist median

  Basis-of-value explicit
  Required
  IVS 104

Investigation level distribution — machinery assignments

  Limited desktop

  45%

  Enhanced desktop

  30%

  Field inspection

  18%

  Full inspection + ME

  7%

Illustrative mix · EU bank maskinfinansiering · 2026

Basis of value
Use case
Marketing period
Workout relevance

Market value (FMV)
Origination LTV
Orderly
Medium

Liquidation value
Forced sale planning
Compressed
High

Fair value (IFRS)
Accounting
Varies
Low–medium

Residual value
Leasing end-of-term
Contractual
High

Salvage value
Total loss
Immediate
Workout

### Operational priorities

- Align credit policy with ivs valuation standards requirements for equipment collateral

- Define basis of value and investigation level per asset class and facility type

- Document monitoring frequency and revaluation triggers for high-EAD machinery

- Separate indicative analytics from IVS-aligned collateral tiers used for credit decisions

- Maintain override authority, logging and model version control where AI assists valuation

- Train underwriters and collateral teams on documentation gaps that attract supervisory scrutiny

### Implementation roadmap

- Methodology policy — Adopt IVS 300 scope and IVS 104 basis-of-value rules for machinery collateral.

- Investigation matrix — Define desktop vs field requirements by asset class and exposure.

- Report template — Standardise IVS 103 reporting elements in kreditakter.

- Valuer panel — Procure IVS/RICS-aligned appraisers with plant and machinery competence.

- Quality review — Sample-check assignments for scope, limitations and comparable adequacy.

- Refresh rules — Set expiry and revaluation triggers aligned with CRR monitoring policy.

## What good looks like

IVS-mature maskinfinansiering functions typically demonstrate:

- Methodology policy referencing IVS 300, 103, 104 and 105 explicitly

- Investigation level matrix by asset class and exposure tier

- External valuer panel with demonstrated plant and machinery competence

- Quality assurance sampling with findings tracked to remediation

- Refresh rules linked to CRR monitoring triggers

- Credit file checklists verifying IVS report elements before drawdown

## Utvald forskning

[IVS 300 Plant & Equipment Bank Implementation](/sv/forskning/ivs-300-plant-utrustning-bank-inforande) is the pillar paper for this section. It provides long-form analysis, primary source references and implementation detail beyond the guides listed below.

Suggested reading order: Start with the pillar paper, then [IVS 300 plant and equipment](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/ivs-300-anlaggning-och-utrustning) and [IVS 103 reporting](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/ivs-103-reporting) for foundational context before exploring the full guide list.

## Guider i det här avsnittet

The following 14 guides cover specific questions valuation methodology, credit risk and collateral teams implementing IVS-aligned machinery valuation at portfolio scale:

- [IVS 300 plant and equipment](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/ivs-300-anlaggning-och-utrustning) — Practical guidance on ivs 300 plant and equipment for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [IVS 103 reporting](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/ivs-103-reporting) — Practical guidance on ivs 103 reporting for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [IVS 104 basis of value](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/ivs-104-basis-av-value) — Practical guidance on ivs 104 basis of value for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [IVS 105 valuation approaches](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/ivs-105-vardering-approaches) — Practical guidance on ivs 105 valuation approaches for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Plant and machinery valuation](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/plant-och-maskinvardering) — Practical guidance on plant and machinery valuation for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Plant and machinery valuation report](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/plant-och-maskinvardering-rapport) — Practical guidance on plant and machinery valuation report for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Machinery valuation report](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/maskinvardering-rapport) — Practical guidance on machinery valuation report for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Equipment valuation methods](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/utrustning-vardering-metoder) — Practical guidance on equipment valuation methods for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [RICS plant and machinery valuation](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/rics-plant-och-maskinvardering) — Practical guidance on rics plant and machinery valuation for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [What is plant and machinery valuation](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/vad-ar-plant-och-maskinvardering) — Practical guidance on what is plant and machinery valuation for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Market value vs likvidationsvärde machinery](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/market-value-eller-likvidationsvarde-maskiner) — Practical guidance on marknadsvärde vs likvidationsvärde machinery for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Fair marknadsvärde tunga maskiner](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/verkligt-marknadsvarde-tunga-maskiner) — Practical guidance on fair marknadsvärde tunga maskiner for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Liquidation value plant machinery](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/likvidationsvarde-plant-maskiner) — Practical guidance on likvidationsvärde plant machinery for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

- [Forced sale value construction equipment](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder/tvangsforsaljningsvarde-utrustning) — Practical guidance on forced sale value construction equipment for heavy machinery portfolios at EU institutions.

## Vanliga frågor

### Which IVS standards apply to bank machinery collateral?

IVS 300 for plant and equipment, supported by IVS 103 reporting, IVS 104 bases of value and IVS 105 valuation approaches. Investigation level must be proportionate to the assignment.

### What is the difference between market and likvidationsvärde?

Market value reflects orderly disposal in an appropriate marketing period. Liquidation value assumes compressed timelines — critical for workout and some facility types. IVS 104 requires explicit basis selection.

### When is a desktop machinery valuation sufficient?

When investigation level is proportionate to value, asset homogeneity and risk. High-value or customised plant typically requires field inspection or equivalent condition evidence.

### How does RICS VPGA 5 relate to IVS 300?

RICS plant and machinery guidance complements IVS for UK and international assignments. EU banks often reference both when procuring external valuers.

### How do ivs valuation standards requirements differ for leasing versus bank lending?

Leasing books emphasise restvärde and end-of-term remarketing; bank lending emphasises LGD and workout recovery. Both require IVS-defensible collateral values and documented monitoring, but policy emphasis and trigger design differ by product.

### What should second-line risk review test for ivs valuation standards?

Sample kreditakter for policy compliance, investigation level proportionality, monitoring history between appraisals, override documentation where AI assists valuation, and consistency across asset classes within the equipment portfolio.

## How Cendex supports ivs valuation standards

Cendex is a collateral intelligence platform for maskinfinansiering — not a bank or appraisal bureau. The [IVS Valuation Standards](/sv/ivs-varderingsstandarder) knowledge base connects to Cendex Terminal modules that operationalise IVS-aligned valuation, portfolio monitoring and EU AI Act documentation for AI-assisted tiers.

Förmåga
Relevans

IVS-aligned reports
Defensible fair marknadsvärde for kreditakter

Portfolio monitoring
Drift detection beyond annual desktop reviews

Confidence bands
Escalation when market evidence is thin

Audit trail
Trace ID, model version and sign-off for deployer obligations

Reference data
Make / model taxonomy for tunga maskiner

[För institutioner](/sv/foretag) to discuss deployment for your institution.

## Documentation expectations

Credit files should retain evidence that ivs valuation standards requirements were met at origination and through the facility life: valuation reports with IVS scope, monitoring timestamps, trigger responses, override rationale and committee approvals where policy requires. Workout teams need the same chain — not a last-minute appraisal alone.

## Related sections

- [Machinery Evaluation & Appraisal](/sv/maskinbedomning) — Machinery evaluation and equipment appraisal for banks and lenders financing heavy construction and agricultural equipment.

- [Equipment Asset Classes](/sv/maskinklasser) — Collateral valuation by tunga maskiner class: excavators, loaders, tractors, harvesters and cranes for EU banks.

- [Collateral Monitoring & Operations](/sv/bevakning-av-kreditobjekt) — Continuous equipment bevakning av kreditobjekt, LTV drift and revaluation triggers for heavy machinery portfolios.

[Underlag för kreditobjekt overview](/sv/kreditobjekt) · [All research](/sv/forskning) · [Enterprise access](/sv/foretag)
